He has been spot on for plenty of stories. More reliable than NYT or WP.
At one time I had a hard time remembering which source like the New York Times and Washington Post were all lies/propaganda intentionally verses sources which might have some factual problems sometimes in attempt to be first at story but not in attempt to deceive. My mnemonic is this:
New York Slimes and Washington Compost. I have not had problems remembering main media lying sites since.
The usual culprits of CNN, ABC, NBC, etc. were always obvious to me. Fox became that way, so I use it mainly to see what the up and coming enemy is trying.
Note, the NDAA authorizes US intelligence agencies to use propaganda news reports as they desire...its legal for them to lie to the public now. And, it seems I read somewhere, that the intelligence agencies have paid main media news networks to run certain news and view points for some years now. Hence, the attack on “fake” news by the main media and intelligence agencies.
Sometimes, overseas news from the UK, Australia and to my surprise RT has been more accurate even with their slant. If I want accurate Middle East or European reality, I can go to some alternate sources from those areas that are live viewing the action in Europe or the Middle East.
A couple of examples is the build up of NATO forces on Russia’s Eastern border verses the story line that Russia is aggressive. To my best knowledge, I think Russia was invited into the Ukraine as the CIA was over throwing the Russian friendly leadership in Ukraine. So Russia was invited. NATO and USA were not invited.
Similarly, Russia was invited into Syria. America, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UK and ISIS were not invited into Syria.
So different then the official narrative in America.