Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer

Exactly.

Bottom line is people make choices in their own self interest - to serve (get promoted, get honor, larger command, etc) or not to serve but do other things. They accept the risks associated with their choices. Lots of non-military roles are dangerous and high-risk.


26 posted on 10/20/2013 8:32:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

The vote is bestowed only to those who “choose” to spend time as a slave of the fascist state.

No thanks


28 posted on 10/20/2013 8:36:54 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

The point in ST was not that the military was dangerous, but rather that serving showed that a person was willing to subordinate his own personal survival to the survival of the community.

If a war came along, of course. In times of peace many military jobs are less dangerous than many military ones. It’s not the degree of danger in question, it’s the willingness to face that danger to protect the community.


36 posted on 10/20/2013 8:48:45 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson