Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food

If you understood the definition of hearsay then you wouldn’t had made the earlier ridiculous comment about contemporaneous newspaper records, especially when they don’t list a place of birth.


142 posted on 04/09/2013 9:01:37 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
Yes, the contemporaneous newspaper notices are indeed hearsay and inadmissible unless an exception can be found. If you're really interested in the admissibility of old newspaper articles and such, check out Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company. You should assert a hearsay objection to those old notices and you might be able to keep them out.

And, if as you say, the notices provide no information concerning location of birth, you should even assert an objection based on relevance.

So, your point is well taken. I'm not sure if a judge would admit those notices.

I think the more important problem, though, is proving that Obama was born somewhere outside the United States without any witnesses to that fact.

143 posted on 04/09/2013 9:15:51 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson