Posted on 08/11/2012 4:40:16 PM PDT by SatinDoll
Go look at some of Karl’s past predictions, but don’t drink anything while you’re reading. You’ll ruin your screen.
Yawn. Everyone voted for TARP and the Patriot Act except Ron Paul and Barbara Lee. WTF does this have to defeating America’s Hugo Chavez? NO MORE NAVEL-GAZING. Time to STFU and unite to defeat the son of a bitch Obama.
“Opinions are like you-know-what, everybodys got one.” you forgot the other part...
...and they always stink!
Thank you for the post.
Here’s a test for you. Read the first two lines of the original post and think of Biden. That’s where I stopped reading.
” picking someone that’s dumber than a box-o-rocks may cost you the election,...”
Like Joe BIDEN?!?!? Didn’t seem to cost obama the 2008 election, did it?
This is irrelevant anyways. EVERY Republican is “dumber than a box of rocks” according to the left. So no matter WHO was chosen, he would have been deemed “dumber than a box of rocks”
The problem with extreme libertarians is that they would rather take credit for being pure rather than take responsibility for actually governing.
The Libertarians have been running presidents in every election since 1972. Their best showing was in 1980 when they cracked 1% of the national popular vote for the first time and got close to one million votes. They haven't even cracked a half million votes since save only in 2008 when the two main choices were our incumbent Marxists and an even worse RINO that the top of the GOP ticket now.
Why is it going to be any different this year?
Further, while the Libertarians have elected a local candidate here and there, they have yet to elect a single candidate to congress in over 40 years of existence. There success has been far more prevalent in siphoning enough votes from the GOP in the November general election to elect Democrat ass-clowns who are far, far worse. Exhibit A is Al Franken.
Sometimes the level of political cowardliness surprises even me.
It didn’t seem to hurt obama when he selected an idiot for veep.
It's reaching epic proportions these days, even here it seems.
In this case, we don't have to wonder.
I
Thou shalt create an illusion of invulnerability shared by most members to foster excessive optimism and encourage extreme risks taking
II
Thou shall not allow any member to question the group's inherent morality, instead members shall be encouraged to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of their decisions
III
Thou shalt promote collective efforts to rationalize in order to discount warnings, or other information that might lead members to reconsider their assumptions before they recommit themselves to their assumptions
IV
Thou shalt reinforce stereotyped views of enemy leaders as too evil to warrant genuine attempts to negotiate, or as too weak and stupid to counter whatever risky attempts are made to defeat their purpose
V
Thou shalt self-censor any deviation from the apparent group consensus, inclining each member to minimize the importance of their doubts and counterarguments
VI
Thou shalt create and maintain a shared illusion of unanimity concerning judgment conforming to the majority view
VII
Thou shalt apply direct pressure on any member who expresses strong arguments against any of the group's stereotypes, illusions, or commitments, making clear that this type of dissent is contrary to what is expected of all loyal members
VIII
Thou shalt appoint mind guards to protect the group from adverse information that might shatter their shared complacency about the effectiveness and morality of their decisions
Well, this will appeal to the ten people who give a crap what he writes.
Frankly, at this point it doesn’t matter one way or the other. This country is up a creek either way.
And chaos theory says it’s going to collapse within a few years anywise.
Bravo!
“We can hold Obama in check for 4 more years.”
I would tend to disagree with that. Obama has been showing his true colors lately, and has no use for the Constitution, or even Congress and the Senate (as in ignoring it even with Republicans controlling both houses).
I just got done reading “The Communist” by Paul Kangor. That’s the book about Frank Marshall Davis, one of Obama’s influences. Davis was a Stalinist. Some of the spew from this administration is just about word for word resembling Davis’ writings.
I wonder if Wisconsin is a state where Ryan can run for VP and Congress in the same year and day.
Opinions are like you-know-what, and Deninger sounds like he is one.
On Fox News they had a quick interview with a guy that pretty much summed up this election. The Fox interviewer asked this gentleman what he thought about the Ryan appointment. The man answered something like this: I don't know anything about Ryan and I don't much about Romney either but I know Obama and I'm voting for Romney.
This shows in one interview why Obama went negative so quickly. Obama figures his only chance may be to disqualify Romney in the minds of the electorate. How sad is it Obama and his creatures figure the only way to win is to make Romney seem more toxic than Obama.
I suspect this guy never votes in a general election.
You’re right. We need to focus on winning the election, and then our stealth conservative nominees will strip off their Republican Establishment costumes to reveal the conservative Supermen underneath, just like Bush.
And then our newly elected stealth conservatives can start doing important conservative things like Bush did - containing entitlements by expanding Medicare, restraining spending by supporting TARP, fixing the SCOTUS by putting real conservative originalists on it like Justce Roberts, standing up to the sodomite agenda by putting one in change of the national party, rolling back affirmative action by putting people like Alberto Gonzales, Condi Rice, Colin Powell, and others in top positions, and fighting illegal immigration by prosecuting Border Patrol Agents like Ramos aqnd Campeon.
Yes, sir. Only inside-the-Beltway “experts” and elected politicians are capable of have informed, rational, honest thoughts about our politics and government. This Deninger guy is just too “extreme”. He must be one of those Tea Party nuts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.