If you can explain to me the legal differences between legitimate and legitimated, then you have a point. And if you understand Kenyan marriage rituals with regards to British citizenship law without reaching out to “armchair internet” definitions, touché for you.
Otherwise, your lack of legal and cultural understanding of British citizenship law is evident by your veil insults. Cite case law. Cite legislature. Cite barrister interpretations. Cite anything you want. By all means, knock yourself out.
I have seen this sort of behavior amongst several women here on Free Republic. They simply are angry other cultures allow men to pass citizenship to their legitimate, illegitimate, and bigamous children. They get angry the framing fathers did not allow bastard children to be president. They are still angry the world is not equal and they want their opinion to be known by the roar of their voices. Are you one of these members?
There is no use citing anything to you because you don’t understand how to read the law. Those that do know can see that you don’t. Those that are not sure how to read the law might actually believe you.
And that’s too bad because you don’t know what you are talking about.