Obama/Cameron/Sarko's 'New Libya' Descending Into Violent, Medieval Chaos

Reaganite Republican ^ | November 23, 2011 | Reaganite Republican

[Sacajaweau]

Now remember....Obama said we weren’t REALLY involved.

[Travis McGee]

“Gee, nobody saw this coming!”
~~a typical libtard

[pabianice]

One notes that the ONLY Middle East patch of land that changed government since World War II and has not descended into a barbaric, chaotic, blood bath populated by 80 IQ, psychopathic, kleptomaniacal goat-herders is ... Israel! More than coincidence?

[Doc Savage]

Occupy Libya! Calling all anarchist and tweebs in the U.S. Ask mommy and daddy for airfare to Libya. You can camp out in a spacious desert. Take a crap anywhere! It’s all crap! Stay forever!

[Sacajaweau]

This is a Muslim state and they’re all crazy. At least Ghaddaffi had them under control....

[Reaganite Republican]

“At least Ghaddaffi had them under control....”
______________________________________________

My point exactly... and we had HIM largely under control as well

[Texas Eagle]

Now remember....Obama said we weren’t REALLY involved.

Well, now, that's not really fair to Circus Maximus (or however you say Our Dear Leader in French).

It depends on the nature of the story.

If it's good news, then Urkel single-handedly brought peace and Democracy to Lybia (official White House spelling) just like he single-handedly conceived, planned and carried out the raid on bin Laden.

But if it's bad news, such as this story or the death of 30 Navy SEALs who are shot out of the sky, well, you can't really hold him accountable.

[Sacajaweau]

This was all about assassination.

[ClearCase_guy]

Egypt — We got involved; now there is chaos and violence
Libya — We got involved; now there is chaos and violence

Syria — they already have chaos and violence, so our involvement is not needed

[Texas Eagle]

Amazing. Sounds almost exactly how The French Revolution evolved. It wasn't long before accusers were being accused themselves and blood was running thick through the streets.

I guess history really does repeat itself.

It's just a matter of time before Napoleon rises in Libya. That should be fun.

[Salvey]

At least Ghaddaffi had them under control....

Just as Saddam Hussein had the shiites under control. Now, thanks to the poseur's foreign policy (or lack thereof), the ME has become even more of a flaming hell hole.

[Oatka]

“At least Ghaddaffi had them under control....”
My point exactly... and we had HIM largely under control as well

The old State Depaertment joke applies here: "Yes, he's a bastard, but he's OUR bastard."

[ken21]

anyone that believes we can help establish “democracy”

in many countries, much less islamic, is nuts!

we can’t even manage our ballot boxes and computers.

[Leaning Right]

I am sorry to say it, but Libya, Egypt, and likely Syria will be unmitigated disasters by the time it's all said and done, as the only stable scenarios now look to involve Islamic dictatorships, ala Iran.

Agreed. But I would also add Afghanistan and Iraq to that list. Do not let Bush II off the hook just because he has an R next to his name.

The present turmoil in the region is a shared failure, Bush II and Obama.

[BitWielder1]

This is a Muslim state and they’re all crazy. At least Ghaddaffi had them under control....

The Strong Man state form seems to be the only thing that works in that region.
Except Israel. Yet another reason for Muslims to hate them.

[mazda77]

Democracy is Mob Rule. Democratic Republic is the basis for Freedom.

[fabian]

This will not change until the cult of Islam is destroyed and replaced with true christianity....

[Reaganite Republican]

Yep, very apt

We no longer can afford the luxury of trying to liberate the world, and peoples not ready for anything beyond a 7th Century form of governance

Only useful bastards for me lol

[ken21]

yeah.

i put “democracy” in quotes so that everyone would get it.