RIP
Posted on 08/14/2011 1:58:41 PM PDT by charlene4
Thanks for the link. No way it is just a timeout. When the Big Guy says, ‘marxist defender zot’, the fat lady has sung. ;)
Yup, when the Boss says marxist defender zot, I would think it is lights out for good. It will return under another screen name.
It might. But unlike some trolls, curiosity had a distinguishing trait he/she will find it almost impossible to mask—an almost insane level of arrogance/condescension. For that alone, he/she is one retread we will be able to spot a mile away. ;)
Curiosity initially had on his homepage that he is an economics professor. I believe he was from Washington or some liberal state in the northwest. He had changed his page. Too many were catching on that he was a liberal troll.
You are spot on, DJMW. Too many caught on...and then the Big Kahuna caught on.
Finis.
;)
His posts gave away what his politics were but his page cinched it.
Agreed! His page cinched it—and a lightning bolt clinched it. ;)
Haha!!! :-D
I never conversed with curiosity, so never clicked on its about page. Most professors are liberal. My BIL is a professor in a small college in Texas, but there is no way he would vote for a dim.
I agree that not all professors are liberal. But an economics prof from Washington can’t be anything else. lol
One of curiosity’s posts that didn’t get nearly enough attention was when he called anybody who opposed raising the debt ceiling a “moron”. Real sharp debating skills, there. You couldn’t reason with him, though, because he started with the ground rule: I am a highly educated ‘economist’ and you are an ignorant rube’. After that, it was all insults and condescension.
But not anymore. haha.
I agree about that not all professors are liberals. Our daughter had to deal with a couple at TAMU. She just couldn’t understand their thinking. Guess we raised her right.
But that's not where we're at, and I don't think we'll ever get there.
Then you have more faith and optimism than I do. I would have never thought we would be teetering on the edge of a financial collapse, but the consequences of allowing Democrats into elected office are likely to become severe.
On this, I hope you turn out to be right.
He’s dead, Jim.
;)
Because they didn't vet him. Had someone raised an objection, (Thanks for nothing John McCain and RNC.) And had that Objection been considered by a deliberative body, such as State Election officials, A Court of Law, or Congress, THEN it could be said that the matter was adjudicated. As none of this occurred, the only reasonable explanation is that no one was even aware that this ought to be an issue.
As all of the research I have seen points out that Obama (as presented) is ineligible, it stands to reason that if the question wasn't called, it can only be because of Malice or Ignorance, and I chose to believe that our governmental Officials are not maliciously inclined towards our nation. That leaves Ignorance. They just didn't know any better.
For some, that might be a selling point. :)
:)
Liberals have to jump through hoops to avoid logical conclusions and come to a marxist solution. Anyone raised with common sense can’t understand the tortured reasoning of a lib. And too, one has to be an emotional wreck to agree with emotion driven policies. Sane people will never “get it”.
It wasn’t just any ole zot either. Le Grande Fromage himself threw the bolt:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2744423/replies?c=140
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.