Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia Teen Figures Out Birth Certificate- Official Proof 1 ( Layers )
youtube ^ | April 27, 2011 | Albert Renshaw

Posted on 06/23/2011 5:46:53 AM PDT by arthurus

I searched this but didn't find it. It is 2 months old but it's an "of course!" thing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: bachmann; birthcertificate; certifigate; elections; fraud; hopespringseternal; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin; romney; thistimeforsure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2011 5:46:57 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Good Boy!..................Hope this goes viral................


2 posted on 06/23/2011 5:57:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (Nothing is a 'right' if someone has to give it to you................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Las Vegas Ron

ping


3 posted on 06/23/2011 6:01:12 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

The biggest problem I see with the BC shown is it’s printed on security paper. Photocopiers weren’t in wide use in 1961. In fact, they were quite rare in the ‘60’s because they were so expensive. Photo copiers didn’t become common until the mid to late 1970’s, and with that came security paper. I worked on copiers, took formal Xerox training, etc, when I was an undergrad working as an intern for Nuclear Assurance Corp. To me, this is a simple, glaring flaw no one seems to address. The rest of the stuff you can find in Adobe Illustrator adds fuel to the fire, but it seems the use of security paper is the biggest flaw in the forgery.


4 posted on 06/23/2011 6:02:24 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus; xzins; wmfights; blue-duncan; Alamo-Girl

Unbelievable!!

No, for this Administration.... totally believable.

Send this video to everyone you know.


5 posted on 06/23/2011 6:03:06 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus; xzins; wmfights; blue-duncan; Alamo-Girl

Unbelievable!!

No, for this Administration.... totally believable.

Send this video to everyone you know.


6 posted on 06/23/2011 6:03:11 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Pretty obvious fake....the prof is in the pixels. I do pixel art as a hobby and there is no way a “scanned” written signature can have such clean, uniform colored pixels as he demonstrates in the video. It’s an obvious fake


7 posted on 06/23/2011 6:04:10 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

i knew it was a fake the day it was released. having spent 30+ years in the industry, it wasn’t difficult.

i called my congressman’s office (and a few others)... none cared

something else to keep in mind. the timing.

what happened about 5 days after this was released? you know... just about the time ‘it’s a fake’ the groundswell was getting going

it knocked the ‘it’s a fake’ story out of the press and stamped the BC as ‘received & certified... moving on’

the event was planned for months. the timing was exact to coincide with the BC release.

remember what it was?


8 posted on 06/23/2011 6:04:48 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

Seal Team Six


9 posted on 06/23/2011 6:06:51 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
“Photocopiers weren’t in wide use in 1961”

Well that's not true - we had fine copiers back then. Used some process that made the pages slightly sticky and somewhat washed out. We had a guy that was really anal about copying everything. You can imagine his surprise when he found out that all the copies began fading immediately, and were illegible within five years.

No way this was copied on one of the POS copiers we had in the ‘60’s. I didn't see one that was worth a hoot until the ‘73-74 timeframe.

10 posted on 06/23/2011 6:11:39 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Broker

bingo!

one taxpayer-funded, life risking, made to order diversion to cover this bs

American’s lives were put into harms way, specially on that day, for political reasons

(i would also contend you NEVER kill the target if you know he’s hunkered down. just watch him and track all contacts back to their source. killing osama helped AQ... it didn’t hurt them as much as people would think)


11 posted on 06/23/2011 6:11:58 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Look at the "Barack" in this zoomed in portion of the document. You can see that the only original typed letter is the "R". If this was typed in 1961 and just scanned in like they claim...all of the letters should look just like the "R" but they don't because the rest of the name has been doctored and re-created on a pixel level.


12 posted on 06/23/2011 6:14:49 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Are you talking about photocopiers or mimeograph machines? Xerox released the model 914 in 1959. It was the first true plain paper copier, but it was very expensive. I haven’t been able to nail down an exact date, but I don’t think security paper came along until the mid 1970’s when photocopying and forging checks became popular. I think what they did here is take a known BC from the 70’s (hence the use of security paper) and add Obamalamadingdong’s information.


13 posted on 06/23/2011 6:18:35 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
The biggest problem I see with the BC shown is it’s printed on security paper.

Not a problem - the photocopy, which is recent, is on security paper, not the original which was copied out of a bound book.

14 posted on 06/23/2011 6:21:23 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

What is most sad is that some many so-called good people are willing to take the word of a constant and notorious liar—Obama—only because he has gained power. And these so-called good people not only take the word of liar, they viciously and constantly mock the honest and earnest for trying to gain the truth of the matter.


15 posted on 06/23/2011 6:21:34 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin
Claimed? Who claimed? This was printed out RECENTLY ~ as a photocopy on security paper.

That's the way they do it.

Back in an earlier time it'd been produced through a photostat process.

Another poster pointed out we had thermographic copiers back in the 60s.

16 posted on 06/23/2011 6:23:15 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Not a problem - the photocopy, which is recent, is on security paper, not the original which was copied out of a bound book.

A photoshop confection is not a photocopy. And no one said that the original was copied out of a bound book.

17 posted on 06/23/2011 6:23:55 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

ping for later


18 posted on 06/23/2011 6:24:15 AM PDT by fujimoh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

What is also sad is the utter failure of the media to look at this obvious fake. I mean come on now...


19 posted on 06/23/2011 6:24:36 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Groan.

It was printed on security paper a few weeks ago. That doesn’t make it a forgery. The original was scanned at some point, stored for an unknown period (perhaps decades), and then printed on the security paper. That’s functionally identical to modern photocopy methods (scan-then-print) with only an intervening delay, which due to storage constraints prompts technical shortcuts which produce the multi-layer multi-resolution artifacts.

Heck, one way or another the original gets scanned, processed, and rendered on your computer monitor - which isn’t any more or less proof of forgery, just the reality of modern technology.

The ultimate proof it’s NOT a fake is its own content. Nobody would produce a forgery which, if taken as the truth it alleges, proves he is ineligible.


20 posted on 06/23/2011 6:25:56 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson