“brief excerpts” does not equal “therefore, the article must be posted in its entirety.”
“only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants” does not equal the perfectly usual and required link to the source material/full article.
“the more apt I am to ban his account and blog” does not equal “therefor, a small group of freepers should take it upon themselves to create and enforce a standard for certain blogs and bloggers, according to their particular point-of-view”
Like your particular point-of-view should overrule that of those who are obviously working with Jim's permission and approval on his own site?
What are you trying to achieve, exactly, with this incessant and unneccesary argument? Why not go to the ultimate authority and settle it once and for all?
I think I know.
Yeah it does.
Yeah it does.
Yeah it does. This is why Jim dubbed humblegunner Blogger Overlord. Simply because you don’t like it doesn’t change it.
If this was a trial and you were the defense lawyer the jury would put YOU in prison.