it troubles me greatly to see that you and other members of FR are willing to throw birthers under the bus. it seems to me that if the founders used the phrase natural born citizen then it was meant to mean something, and a continuing discussion of what it means must come before abandoning the issue. making light of people who want a serious discussion of its relevance is the easy way out. see my tagline.
>>it troubles me greatly to see that you and other members of FR are willing to throw birthers under the bus. it seems to me that if the founders used the phrase natural born citizen then it was meant to mean something, and a continuing discussion of what it means must come before abandoning the issue. making light of people who want a serious discussion of its relevance is the easy way out. see my tagline.<<
You don’t understand. This is not the time nor the place for that discussion. Like it or not, the release of the COLB ends the discussion.
I am not making light — I am EMPHASIZING — you birthers are factually wrong and should let it drop.
If you want to start a “discussion” of citizenship, then link it to anchor babies and immigration reform as it should be.
In the meantime you just like you are putting tin-foil on the entire Tea Party movement’s collective head.
LET IT GO. There is no “there” there.