Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 0beron

I’m sorry but your analyses and comparison of Eastern and Western Empires is incorrect. The centralization and high taxes were not the root causes of the fall, they were the problems of the 200s century not the 300s.


130 posted on 04/11/2011 7:35:32 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
I’m sorry but your analyses and comparison of Eastern and Western Empires is incorrect. The centralization and high taxes were not the root causes of the fall, they were the problems of the 200s century not the 300s.

Centralization and high taxes were not root causes. The collapse of morality was. I never said that. They were certainly significant. Actually, decentralization was a becoming a significant problem in the 300s after Constantine. You wrote that you believe that morals were improving in the fourth and fifth century. What evidence do you have have for this?

135 posted on 04/11/2011 9:39:40 AM PDT by 0beron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

I’ll be reading this. I like the Cato Institute for starters, but the first couple of sentences caught my attention.

It’s one thing I alluded to above with regard to State Socialism in the Roman Empire. It as certainly a factor and seems to belie what you’re saying when you say centralization and taxation wasn’t a problem in the 300s. The Reforms of Diocletian for example, attempting to stop inflation not only by freezing prices, but occupations as well:

http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cjv14n2-7.html


136 posted on 04/11/2011 9:55:06 AM PDT by 0beron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson