Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel; curiosity
Perhaps I'm missing the "gist" of the argument here, but clearly RS is correct when stating that the "two citizen parents" argument for one to be a "Natural Born Citizen" was clearly mentioned well before Barry was elected...or selected at the DNC for that matter. Perhaps not a firestorm of conversation here on FR, but doing a simple search with Google for:

two citizen parents "natural born citizen" between the dates of Jan 1, 2008–Aug 24, 2008 gives (according to Google) "About 21,900 results" with many familiar sites listed.

Granted, there are more than likely duplicates, and many/most are probably dealing with John McCain's eligibility questions...but clearly the issue was being discussed early in 2008 regardless that the state run media clammed up on the issue once it moved from McCain to Soetoro.

167 posted on 01/19/2011 12:44:59 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid; Red Steel; LorenC
Perhaps I'm missing the "gist" of the argument here, but clearly RS is correct when stating that the "two citizen parents" argument for one to be a "Natural Born Citizen" was clearly mentioned well before Barry was elected...

No, he is clearly incorrect. The two-citizen-parent argument did not emerge until after the election. As LorenC pointed out, the post Red Steel produced is NOT making that argument. It's a comment on a blog that was claiming Obama's mother was too young to pass on her US citizenship to her son even if he was born in Hawaii.

clearly the issue was being discussed early in 2008

No it was not. I defy you to find a single example prior to November of 2008. The hits you got on Google refer to something else.

169 posted on 01/19/2011 12:56:49 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
Perhaps I'm missing the "gist" of the argument here, but clearly RS is correct when stating that the "two citizen parents" argument for one to be a "Natural Born Citizen" was clearly mentioned well before Barry was elected...or selected at the DNC for that matter. Perhaps not a firestorm of conversation here on FR, but doing a simple search with Google for:

That was the argument and a silly one. I don't see the relevancy since Berg's law suit was based on Obama being born overseas, and the dubious Obama COLBs published on the Internet on June 12th and again on or about August 2nd took up the issue in Summer of 2008. Those two issues took up most of the air-time about Obama's eligibility.

It seems to be Loren and Ms. Un-curious contention that since the '2 citizen parents' argument was not at the forefront at that time, the issue was made up out of whole cloth.

170 posted on 01/19/2011 1:05:29 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson