Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2010 11:28:13 AM PST by RINOS ARE RADICALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: RINOS ARE RADICALS
Of course he does... he is a pro abortion, high tax loving, fetal stem cell research supporting, big government welfare pimp, playing a Conservative of the prince of the house of Saud’s news network. FU krauthammer.

LLS

33 posted on 12/17/2010 1:02:45 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RINOS ARE RADICALS

Didn’t Krauthammer favor Obama in the election? Or maybe I am “misremembering”.


34 posted on 12/17/2010 1:05:06 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RINOS ARE RADICALS
Notice Charles never attacks Palin and substitive issues

You mean substantive issues? That's because he agrees with her most of the time.

its always personal attacks or character flaws that can never be resolved?

You're delusional. Never once has Kraut attacked her personally or pointed out character flaws. But he has questioned her electability due to A) inexperience -- especially her knowledge of foreign affairs; B) her high unfavorability ratings; C) the methods she uses to "introduce" herself to the American people -- in particular, her TV show and Twitter.

Personally I disagree with Kraut's (A,B,C) assessments, but his criticism isn't ad hominem.

36 posted on 12/17/2010 1:26:28 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RINOS ARE RADICALS
The guy is a wolf in sheeps clothing, and is not to be admired on our side

Hey, he's a neo-con. That said, his analyses are usually very good and he's got a very funny, sharp wit. I disagree with him fairly often -- especially on economic matters where he shows himself to be somewhat ignorant (IMHO).

So what. I enjoy listening to him. The panel on Bret Baier's show is hardly worth watching when he's not there. For that matter, I disagree with George Will often, too.

They're opinion-writers. Good ones. Enjoy and critique.

39 posted on 12/17/2010 3:21:23 PM PST by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RINOS ARE RADICALS
Well we have another night where charles krauthammer on the fox all stars, says obama won everything and the republicans lost the 2012 elections because of being rolled by obama.

chuckie thinks a trillion in new spending is going to stimulate the economy (the other 3.3 trillion in spending has done nothing but depress the economy further into the abyss) and obama will get the credit... but chuckie is on so much dope that he is not thinking straight... the omnibutt bill with 1.3 trillion in NEW spending is dead. The tax extension bill only has 283 billion in new spending so it is not a trillion... but the liberal chuckie krauthammer sees an extension of the tax rates in effect for a decade now... as NEW spending that somehow will stimulate the economy. All it will do is it will cause no further decline in the economy by itself... but no stimulus will be seen and I have now put krauthammer in the same league as carville and beckel. Hey chuck... if you are reading this... FU chuck!

LLS

40 posted on 12/17/2010 4:10:02 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson