I agree, but that IS NOT what BB wrote and if you read back through the thread you will see that she steadfastly REFUSED to answer a simple yes or no question (see posts 20, 26, 30, 41, 47, 67, 84). Why do you think someone would refuse to answer such a simple yes or no question?
Big Bureaucracy stated she would abide what the military decides.
Like she has a choice.
Why should she? She is dealing with the facts as they exist.
You mock that her abiding by the military decisions "as if she has a choice" at the same time accuse her of an agenda as if her disagreeing with you makes any real difference in the situation. As it stands they are allowed by condoned lying. Either let them or don't let them in is what I hear her saying. No personal opinions necessary
First the thread was hijacked because the lot of you think you found someone you could bash as being sympathetic with gays. Then pile on without regard to her valid points that DADT is bad policy.
What does any individual opinion matter except for the purpose of fueling some weird "if you aren't repulsed by gays as much as us you're no conservative" crap?