Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SumProVita
It was at least a 43 minute speech--there was an unexplained audio/video gap presumably because the NAACP edited it before releasing it. Breitbart didn't have to provide the context. The clip speaks for itself. He couldn't show the entire 43 minutes even if he had the complete tape. The NAACP condemned her even though they had the tape.

Here is the complete text of the speech. The woman is a racist. She sees everything thru the prism of race.

56 posted on 07/22/2010 8:21:28 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

“The clip speaks for itself.”

This clip misleads as to the focus of she was trying to share. Overall, given other statements and subsequent remarks, I believe the woman has several issues. However, the point is that anyone watching the clip would naturally focus on HER and what she says in the clip.

Breitbart should have been VERY clear about what he was trying to do with the presentation of the clip...that it wasn’t about HER....but about the reaction of the NAACP audience

However, I want conservative to be above reproach in this type of thing....particularly if they are in the business of communication (journalism).


109 posted on 07/22/2010 8:59:54 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson