Only some times.
There is only one that matters, the qualifications for POTUS. That defination has not been specifically defined by the SCOTUS, and because of this, the only defination we have is what the founders intended. That the President be a child of two parents who were citizens and be born on the soil of the US or its territory.
Thats it.
There is no arguing out of that. The ONLY body that can define it is SCOTUS who with it’s current makeup, would rule in favor of the Founders ORIGINAL intent, all of which points to Obama being an usurper.
Now, to get a case legitimately before SCOTUS...
Ping to thread, its the end that’s interesting... and this newbie poster, who seems to think that he is all that with constitutional definitions, and history. Maybe he is... maybe he is a SCOTUS judge incognito... (giggle) Seems to know more than SCOTUS who interestingly enough has never decided exactly specifically what NBC is... golly.... he also seems to miss that until they DO we don’t have ANY guide at all, but a pretty damned good indication we have an unconstitutional government. EnderWiggens, joined Jan of 2010.