Save it for the kindergartners EW.
I am neither buying into your condensation or your bogus argumnets.
You have been proven wrong by no less than 6 people posting differing levels of information including Title 3 of Public Law 414 which I researched and posted myself.
Now, how about you just concede like an adult. I can admit when I am wrong, you apparently aren’t big enough to do so.
That says a lot more about you than it does anyone else.
again attempting for a grain of salt to make a loaf of bread.
The laws of the United states do not take presidence over the laws of a non-domiciled resident alien, in any part of the United States.
Barack Hussein Obama Sr, by his citizenship, governance, and allegiance under his law, not the United States law, by nature and tacit consent, bestowed upon his offspring his condition without any statute or all the rights and privilges of a British subject, as as admitted by BHO.
you do not seem to understand, that that sole jurisdiction of the United States is required, as stated, not merely to some extent, but full and complete.
The 1964 divorce papers establish the parental lineage of his father and as so noted. Legal document, BHO Sr his father.
You are the one showing that your allegiance is to an unknown, undicoumented illegal alien, who refuses to establish his credentials in the basic of forms or required by law, and the Constitution.
Talk about who is un-patriotic, or Un-American, look in the mirror.
you prove nothing other than that you yourselves are not really patriots at all.
~~~
Do you value your posting privileges here?
If so, I suggest you refrain from such
statements.
Not buying your cow cookies EW.
I think that you are completely wrong.
I also think you will be eating crow when a case finally makes it to SCOTUS. The ONLY body with the constitutional authority to make the decision. At that point, Federal Marshals will remove Obama, if he is still in office that is. There is far too much evidence that is completely contrary to your “opinion”. You can go ahead and continue to waste your time. Up to you. But you are barking up the wrong tree with a lizard.
I am not buying your argument that the lizard is a dog.
And that is the damn point, Wiggy ...
Since the term natural born citizen has never been defined either politically, through Constitutional amendment, or judicially, by the Supreme Court, the question devolves to original intent of the Founding Fathers what did they know and how did they know it. The lawyers amongst them were trained, quite brilliantly, in English Law. In fact, many of them received their law degrees in England prior to the revolution
Obama is a citizen of the United States by virtue of being born on United States soil, but he is also a natural born citizen by virtue of the British Nationality Act of 1730 [4 Geo. II, c. 21].
Now, you may say that the British Nationality Act of 1730 [4 Geo. II, c. 21] was legislated, and does not count. However, the definition of natural born subject in English Common Law was also legislated [7 Rep. 7], as well as the exception for children of English ambassadors who are born outside of the sovreigns dominion [7 Rep. 18]. Should we discount these laws too? In fact, should we discard English Common Law completely since it was derived from Roman Law, and then discard Roman Law since it was derived from Greek Law, and then discard Greek Law since it was derived from Biblical Law ??? Of course not. BTW: Biblical Law recognizes citizenship through heredity only.
The Founding Fathers relied on Blackstone, the British Nationality Act of 1730 [4 Geo. II, c. 21], and Calvins Case 7 Coke Report 1a, 77 ER 377 in their understanding of natural born citizen. That meant being born within the sovreigns dominion and under a singular, exclusive allegiance to him. In the eyes of the Founding Fathers, the fact that English Law allowed natural born subject status to children born out of the sovreigns dominion of natural born fathers [4 Geo. II, c. 21] would have necessarily negated Obamas claim to natural born citizenship in the United States. If Obama had lived in the times of the Founding Fathers, he never would have been eligible to run for President.