Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins; BP2; All
Since I have never denied for a second that Obama is a dual citizen

There you go again!

The problem is his SPLIT LOYALTIES (allegiance) stemming from his being a dual citizen... thanks to his father who was a (non-American)British SUBJECT at the time of Obama's birth.

Unfortunately -- thanks to daddy's "dream" vacation in America -- Obama inherited British Subject status... and is still a British SUBJECT... even today!!

Care of Freeper Beckwith:

re: "His Kenyan citizenship lapsed when he turned 21...”

It did not.

The (factcheck) report is not accurate as to Obama’s historical British Subject status in that the implication exists that British subject status was lost along with British citizenship back in 1963.

The proof of this exists in the Kenyan Independence Act of 1963 (KIA) which states in Section 2(1):

2.(1) On and after the appointed day, the British Nationality Acts 1948 and 1958 shall have effect as if-

(a) in section 1(3) of the said Act of 1948 (which provides for persons to be British subjects or Commonwealth citizens by virtue of citizenship of certain countries) there were added at the end the words " and Kenya " ;

Now we must look at the British Nationality Act of 1948, Section 1:

1.-(1) Every person who under this Act is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or who under any enactment for the time being in force in any country mentioned in subsection (3) of this section is a citizen of that country shall by virtue of that citizenship have the status of a British subject.

(2) Any person having the status aforesaid may be known either as a British subject or as a Commonwealth citizen; and accordingly in this Act and in any other enactment or instrument whatever, whether passed or made before or after the commencement of this Act, the expression 'British subject' and the expression 'Commonwealth citizen', shall have the same meaning.

(3) The following are the countries herein before referred to, that is to say, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan, Southern Rhodesia and Ceylon.

According to the KIA, the words -- "and Kenya" -- are added to subsection (3) making all Kenyan citizens also British Subjects upon "the appointed day", December 12, 1963.

First, Obama could not have lost his Kenyan Citizenship on August 4, 1982. This means his foreign nationality issues were not only governed by the Kenyan Constitution, but -- as of January 1, 1983 -- he was also governed by the British Nationality Act of 1981.

AND SO OBAMA WAS A BRITISH COMMONWEALTH CITIZEN AFTER THE BNA OF 1981 took effect Jan 1 1983, AND SO HE STILL IS, since he was not only governed by KIA63.

The ofuscation tactic is to make it seem as if his citizenship vanished, but it did not. Obama is STILL a British Citizen.

117 posted on Monday, January 11, 2010 2:45:31 PM by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

STE=Q

1,101 posted on 02/17/2010 7:59:45 PM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q
"The problem is his SPLIT LOYALTIES (allegiance) stemming from his being a dual citizen... thanks to his father who was a (non-American)British SUBJECT at the time of Obama's birth."

The US Constitution does not appear to care. It never mentions either split loyalties, split allegiances or dual citizenship.
1,148 posted on 02/18/2010 11:03:51 AM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson