[Red Steel]

Because courts don't accept documents they haven't asked for, particularly to make a decision on the outcome of a case they haven't yet accepted as appropriate. I gather that you have no actual comprehension of legal processes. But courts don't want and won't accept documents for determining the validity of a posed question before standing is established, a case is established, and they request them.

Dishonesty is what you like in a president. An honest president would without question submit it to a court to put this matter to an end, but Obama is not honest. It's a simple thing to do as submit a birth certificate to a court.

The non-sequitur nonsense what you guys do ...for all to see.

[curiosity]

An honest president would without question submit it to a court to put this matter to an end, but Obama is not honest

That may well be true, and I agree that Obama isn't an honest man.

Unfortunately, though, honesty isn't a presidential eligibility requirement.

[tired_old_conservative]

“Dishonesty is what you like in a president. An honest president would without question submit it to a court to put this matter to an end, but Obama is not honest. It's a simple thing to do as submit a birth certificate to a court.”

Dishonesty appear to be the hallmark of your character. You don't understand legal processes even after they have been explained to you, you make that self-evident by repeating the same folksy gibberish talking point over and over, and you ultimately have no other recourse than to attack others for your own failings. It's simply a repeat of the silly newspaper error discussion with Curiosity where he is obviously the lucid participant engaging his faculties.

If you would like a President with intellectual honesty, perhaps you should practice that attribute yourself first.