Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

“The applicable law at the time was the Immigration and Nationality Act of like 1951...”


I think it might be the “Immigration and Nationality Act 1952” a/k/a the “Mccarran Walter Immigration and Nationality Act”

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952 (also known as the McCarran-Walter Act) restricted immigration into the U.S. and is codified under Title 8 of the United States Code.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952

§ 1409. Children born out of wedlock

[snip]

(c) Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (a) of this section, a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=wedlock&url=/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001409——000-.html

It appears to read the same, 1 year continuously present.

***

NEED to get ORIGINAL text of the bill to determine the controlling language in 1963.

USC only shows CURRENT law, as amended ...


402 posted on 09/23/2009 11:51:30 AM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: Lmo56

Yeah, good point. I was trying to locate that earlier, without much success. If you find it, please post. Thanks!


403 posted on 09/23/2009 5:54:15 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

To: Lmo56
NEED to get ORIGINAL text of the bill to determine the controlling language in 1963.

USC only shows CURRENT law, as amended ...

If you go to the "Notes" link on the Cornell page, you get the effective date of each section and of any changes to that section. It does not appear that 1409(c) has changed since the 1952 law was passed

436 posted on 09/24/2009 3:18:52 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson