Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: politicalmerc
Discovery is not voluntary. It's a requirement under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It's a bit more complicated than the description you offered.
119 posted on 09/14/2009 10:43:29 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Where I am lost here is: when and where did the judge order discovery, expedited or not?

Last week, 9/8, in the California case (Keyes, et al), the judge set a hearing in October on the defendants’(Obama et al) dismissal motion. He indicated the defendants would have to meet a high bar to have their motion to dismiss granted.

Assuming the dismissal motion is not granted he would then order discovery according to the FRCP, and he has ‘penciled in’ a pre-trial and trial date. If the case IS dismissed on motion, there is no discovery

There was to be, I understood, a hearing today in Georgia about the flight surgeon who was ordered to Afghanistan.

Is the Order that is the topic of this thread regarding discovery from the court in Georgia or California?


128 posted on 09/14/2009 11:01:25 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Well I was making the description to non-lawyers. By voluntary I mean that no Order has to be obtained. You are correct it is not voluntary but it is an Open Order governed by statute.


193 posted on 09/15/2009 5:57:52 AM PDT by politicalmerc (If Birthers are so silly, then why not show the BC and put them to shame?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson