Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hey Seniors! Just Die Already!
WhenWeAreQueen ^ | July 26, 2009 | Queen1

Posted on 07/26/2009 5:29:45 PM PDT by pharmamom

Ezekiel Emmanuel, Rahm’s health-wonk brother, wants the nation’s seniors to just get on with it. Death, that is. Believing that older Americans have already had their fair share of time, he suggests that they be denied health care resources—out of a concern for justice, apparently. This, from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, sums it up:

'In a January article published in the British medical journal Lancet, Emanuel and his co-authors advocate a health rationing policy that discriminates against older people. They wrote, “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination … Treating 65-year-olds differently because of stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently because they have already had more life years is not.” And, “although life-years are equally valuable to all, justice requires the fair distribution of them.”'

So, does that mean Obama is going to deny the mother-in-law medical care should she suffer illness or injury? What about his own mother? Maybe he could talk to some of those Canadian Muslims about swimming lessons for the elderly, get some tips about how to make it go smoothly.

Somehow, I don’t think this is going to go over very well with the AARP.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: dying; emmanuel; healthcare; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Link to the CEI press release: http://cei.org/news-release/2009/07/23/obama-adviser-urges-controversial-%E2%80%9Csenior-death-discount%E2%80%9D-health-care-reform
1 posted on 07/26/2009 5:29:45 PM PDT by pharmamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pharmamom; backhoe

Obama Care - Deathcare.

Backhoe do you have any of your great graphics you could add to this thread?


2 posted on 07/26/2009 5:31:58 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

Ezekiel playing roulette huh. With others’ lives in play. Or is it Wheel of Fortunes?


3 posted on 07/26/2009 5:35:08 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Fili et Spiritus Sancti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Ezekiel Emmanuel, may you have the privilege of dying first! Then, we will think you know that you are willing to stand behind your word.... you weasel
4 posted on 07/26/2009 5:35:57 PM PDT by bareford101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

See page 425 of the new healthcare bill - counseling sessions for seniors on how to die - this is not a joke


5 posted on 07/26/2009 5:37:56 PM PDT by unitedwestand (What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

Hmmm...I thought that was his dad.


6 posted on 07/26/2009 5:38:36 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
I oppose what Obama wants to do to healthcare, but I think many Americans have to wake up to the reality that individuals have to pay — and should pay — for more of their own healthcare. If any entity — an insurance company, government, whatever — is paying for peoples’ medical care, that entity MUST ration, and rationing based on age is one way to do that. Many people over 65 are cheap, cheap, cheap — and I'm talking about rich geezers, too, so the “they-live-on-fixed-incomes-argument” won't wash. Part of the reason we've hurtled so quickly towards socialized medicine is that many older Americans balk at any adjustment to government spending, such as raising the age when you can collect Social Security benefits.
7 posted on 07/26/2009 5:38:48 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom
Somehow, I don’t think this is going to go over very well with the AARP.

The AARP knows all about it. They agreed with the Obama Administration to the cuts in Medicare providing Medicare was opened up to people between ages 50 and 64 - that way, AARP can sell a new group of people Medicare Supplement Insurance (as approved by the Obama Administration).

The AARP is primarily about selling insurance - protecting the rights of seniors is just a sales ploy.

8 posted on 07/26/2009 5:41:53 PM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

Men who think like Ezekiel Emanuel need to be contained for the good of society.


9 posted on 07/26/2009 5:41:58 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unitedwestand

Yes, I know, I have been trying to explain the deathcare bill to several today who supported it. EVEN with the end of life counseling mandatory, I could not win. These are Obama koolaid drinkers of the worst sort.

“We have to do something about healthcare”

One even said - for a doctor to make $350K is outrageous and must be stopped!

But, I said, putting a government bureaucrat in charge of what care you receive and don’t receive and your end of life situation which should by no means include government bureaucratic decisions.....is more like Nazi Germany than the USA!


10 posted on 07/26/2009 5:42:12 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unitedwestand
See page 425 of the new healthcare bill - counseling sessions for seniors on how to die - this is not a joke

How about posting it, if possible?

11 posted on 07/26/2009 5:43:52 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (The revolution IS being televised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

The longer their parents live, the less inheritance they’ll get.


12 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:28 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

I agree. The problem really lies with 71 1/2 and over. They want heart transplants and want us to pay for it.

As I have said before, we just allocate a percentage of GDP to Medicare and be done with it. But Obama wants to cut healthcare to people over 65 and give it to illegal immigrants.

F*ck Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


13 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:38 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

The solution is LESS government involvement in healthcare, not more. It includes tort reform bigtme. It includes giving more tax incentives to healthcare reimbursement accounts and users of those accounts....just for starters.


14 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:45 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pharmamom

Start calling Ft Myers and snow bird papers to ask if the communities like the snowbirds’ business (and relatives’) or not.

Farm agencies & small weeklies. 4-H.


15 posted on 07/26/2009 5:44:56 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Fili et Spiritus Sancti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Think it is brother...

Pharmboy, eh. Am I your mother?


16 posted on 07/26/2009 5:49:56 PM PDT by pharmamom (Queen. Visit the Queendom: www.whenwearequeen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bareford101

AMen!


17 posted on 07/26/2009 5:51:29 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

I agree 100% about the solution’s being less government involvement. My point was that many seniors have abetted this march towards socialism by refusing to consider HOW the government will pay for endless entitlements. Many old Americans who are now afraid they won’t get pacesetters at age 100 were the same people who got hysterical when raising the age for SS benefits was ever raised.


18 posted on 07/26/2009 5:53:27 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

bump


19 posted on 07/26/2009 5:55:06 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
Wacky cheapness afflicts the under 65 set, too. I know women who will not get mammograms unless insurance covers them. I've told some friends if their insurance companies won't cover mammograms until, say, age 40, they should just pay for the mammograms themselves. (Yes, there are places that don't accept insurance that will give and analyze mammograms for paying patients.) But most peoples’ reaction is, “I'm not going to pay for a mammogram!” That's just great, isn't it? People who pay a couple of hundreds of dollars a month on cable and internet balk at paying for a test that could save their lives.
20 posted on 07/26/2009 5:57:21 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson