Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citizens Shouting Out: Georgia Grand Jury Indicts Obama/Soetoro
Evil Conservative Radio ^ | 28 March 2009 | EC

Posted on 03/28/2009 3:43:32 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle

Stockbridge, Georgia- The questions over the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to occupy his current position as President of the United States continue to be raised. After being presented with evidence in the matter, a citizens' grand jury convened by Carl Swensson in Georgia has returned an indictment against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Sutoro.

Reportedly the sealed indictment, scheduled to be delivered to prosecutors on Monday, includes counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. "It's a done deal, and the people of the State of Georgia demand action on this matter," said Carl Swensson after the grand jury proceedings had finished. "I can't comment on this other than to say that the sealed indictment will be delivered to prosecutors on Monday."

(Excerpt) Read more at evilconservativeonline.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: barackobama; barrysoetoro; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; british; certifigate; citizenship; colb; constitution; coverup; crime; democrats; democratscandals; donofrio; doublestandard; eligibility; georgia; grandjury; hawaii; indicted; indictment; ineligible; kenya; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaindicted; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfiles; orly; orlytaitz; presentment; scotus; soetoro; stockbridge; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2009 3:43:33 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Who knows were this will lead.


2 posted on 03/28/2009 3:49:35 PM PDT by A. Morgan (Every night I pray that Rezko and Blago roll over on Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

No where. They don’t have any standing, whatsoever.


3 posted on 03/28/2009 3:54:49 PM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

What does standing have to do with a grand jury?


4 posted on 03/28/2009 3:55:39 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Means that the President can’t be forced to respond to their indictment, nor will any case ever go to court over this.


5 posted on 03/28/2009 3:58:03 PM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Time wounds all heels. Barry will get his someday. The truth always wins. Eventually.


6 posted on 03/28/2009 4:02:18 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty ("Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is FORCE." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

no... standing is a legal term that applies to a plaintiff in a civil suit. I think you mean to say that they haven’t the authority to do so... but according to our own supreme court, they do...so i tmay be ignored by prosecutors, but that doesn’t mean that anyone acted outside their authority. On the contrary.. it means that our government is disregarding common law as well as constitutional law


7 posted on 03/28/2009 4:03:39 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan
Who knows were this will lead.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^’’

Saul Alinsky would say, “It doesn't matter!”

Even if it goes nowhere, it is one more irritant that puts pressure on Obama. It is one more way to make Obama appear to be an illegitimate usurper of the office of president, (whether or not he is or not). Indirectly it makes his policies appear illegitimate as well.

The conservative strategy should never at any time give Obama any rest in anything!....and this includes his natural born status.

8 posted on 03/28/2009 4:14:44 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

gnip


9 posted on 03/28/2009 4:16:00 PM PDT by Nightshift (Faith is something everyone has. The question is faith in what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

This is a make-believe grand jury...but,what the heck: run with it !


10 posted on 03/28/2009 4:23:22 PM PDT by mrmeangenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I have this on background. Obimbo’s teleprompter will be subpoenaed!


11 posted on 03/28/2009 4:25:42 PM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Even if it goes nowhere, it is one more irritant that puts pressure on Obama.

It's one more way to send a message people are increasingly questioning his legitimacy.
12 posted on 03/28/2009 4:25:49 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I completely agree.


13 posted on 03/28/2009 4:27:24 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Apparently it is in the 5th Amendment and sometimes referred to as the “4th Branch of the government”.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2217053/posts?page=18#18

Of course we will have those who want to see America destroyed, as well as those who don’t care enough tell us that we should just ‘grab our ankles’.


14 posted on 03/28/2009 4:28:57 PM PDT by plsjr (<>< "Diversity" = "accept anything, including the worst" Choose the best on its own merits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

Nowhere.

He has Executive immunity since the moment he was sworn in as President. It will be like Clinton. He could not be charged because he was the President and all legal actions against him were postponed while he was in office.


15 posted on 03/28/2009 4:32:22 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (WHAT? Where did my tag line go? (ACORN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

“He has Executive immunity since the moment he was sworn in as President.”

If he does not meet the constitutional requirements for office then he is NOT president and has no immunity.


16 posted on 03/28/2009 4:40:58 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Maybe they will issue THE supeona of the Birth Certificate ?

Would be nice to have some Court somewhere ask to see it..


17 posted on 03/28/2009 4:44:38 PM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

This sounds a bit like “Sovereign Citizen” at play:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1541805/four_men_associated_with_sovereign.html


18 posted on 03/28/2009 4:48:37 PM PDT by mrmeangenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nysuperdoodle

Here’s more:

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/marchforyourcountrycom-launches-informative-web-site,528874.shtml


19 posted on 03/28/2009 4:53:07 PM PDT by mrmeangenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
"He has Executive immunity since the moment he was sworn in as President.",

Actually, he is NOT President. Section three of the twentieth amendment plainly states that a "President elect" MUST "qualify" to be President BEFORE being allowed to become President.

"If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

The burden of "qualifying" rest squarely on the President elect or whoever it might be who is seeking the office of President. It does not require some other person to challenge whether or not qualifications exist.

In addition, the matter of "standing" is clearly laid out in the Constitution as well under Article six as pertaining to the oath of office.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Anyone who has taken THIS oath is duty bound to defend and support the Constitution or they are breaking the law. No court can demand that a person break the law by denying them the opportunity to support the law (the Constitution IS the law).

20 posted on 03/28/2009 4:56:34 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson