Replies

Here, I will use capital letters so that you can all understand me and see that I am serious.

“indylindy”, I am trying to understand your hostility towards me.

To ask where this issue originated is a relevant question and not just some kind of vanity post. I have been following this since August 2008 and I have done a lot of research on this. Sure, I am a new poster, but that does not mean that I don’t know what I am talking about.

There is a lot of strong, circumstantial evidence that supports the hypothesis that Obama is not a nbc. However, we have much less solid evidence to support this. That does not mean that the hypothesis is wrong, it just means we need more data to be taken seriously. If he is truly ineligible, Obama has had a significant headstart at hiding the evidence. He also has the advantage of knowing what incriminating evidence exists. Those of us that seek the truth are looking for needles in a very large and well protected haystack.

One obvious solution is to obtain the vault bc through legal means. In the mean time, those of us that seek that truth need to band together and find the evidence that we need.

Trying to find a solid reference as to who starting asking about Obama’s natural born status and what they based this on is an important part of finding the truth.

Follow the links in post 69. It didn't start with questioning Obama's natural born status. It began with reporters looking at his bona fides, his past as captured in public documents. When they ran into a stonewall regarding his birth certificate, that's when other questions began to arise.

-PJ

I don’t need your capital letters, dear.

You are arrogant as you think you are a first in this. Your questions could have been answered by checking the history from the beginning right here on FR by people who have worked at this for a long time.

We don’t need a vanity by someone who joined here in the last month.