Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pnh102
I’d rather have cops fighting real criminals than going after potheads who are otherwise committing no real crimes.

Which really isn't the case. Pot arrests usually come after someone is stopped for breaking some other law.

25 posted on 01/03/2009 7:17:31 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
Pot arrests usually come after someone is stopped for breaking some other law.

So as long as they are prosecuted for breaking the other law, what's the problem?

As I said before, someone who is getting high but breaking no other laws isn't a danger to anyone else and should not be prosecuted simply for getting high.

35 posted on 01/03/2009 7:25:19 PM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

“Pot arrests usually come after someone is stopped for breaking some other law.

Usually, but not always. The cities and counties LOVE the “civil forfeiture” aspect of the War on Drugs. It gets them all kinds of cash they couldn’t get otherwise. Here’s the most egregious example:

An eccentric millionaire in Malibu, set up and shot dead for his ranch property-

http://www.saveourguns.com/scott001.htm

Civil forfeiture is a nightmare, and there are more than plenty of examples. A violation of the 4th Amendment in my opinion.


48 posted on 01/03/2009 7:40:39 PM PST by GunsAndBibles (God save Calif. - 'cause it's gonna take a miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson