Rudy is honest. He has said his views haven’t changed. What is Fred’s excuse?
Rudy is a douche bag.
Deciding to become pro-life needs no excuse, only congratulations.
He’s said as a constitutional issue roe v wade is bad law and the the choice on abortion should be left to the states. In the senate he had a solid pro life voting record.
Did you have a meeting at your secret squirrel hideout and decide this would be the thread where you’d stake your attack on fred?
Fred says his position HAS changed. I like it when candidates change from the WRONG position to the RIGHT position. Much better than people who have grown old still clinging to their wrong-headed, evil beliefs.
“He has said his views havent changed. What is Freds excuse?”
Maybe he came to the realization that it is a baby being destroyed, not a blob of unviable fetal tissue.
Dynachrome made the same journey. Quote me from 30 years ago, I’ll tell ya how I have changed. Fred may be a bit late, but unlike Romney, I do not think it is political expediency. Rudy is smart in one respect, he realizes that to backtrack on his pro-abortion stand won’t work at this late date.
“Rudy is the “gag” candidate: guns, abortion, gays. Wrong on all three.”
Neither have Hillary's.
What is Freds excuse?
Thompson does not need an excuse for being a consistent pro-life vote in the Senate.
“Rudy is honest. He has said his views havent changed. What is Freds excuse?”
So I guess you are ok with paying for others peoples Abortions....
If you want to question Thompson's changing his mind on an issue, the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform is worth discussing.
Honest. Right.
He was against the PBA ban, now he says he would sign it.
He was against the flat tax, then last week he was for it to get Forbes’ endorsement, now he is against it again.
But, if you really cared about the issue, you wouldn't be supporting RINO Rudy to begin with.
PLEASE explain what i'm missing here.
fyi, i consider him a REALLY fine RINO, who should be a DIMocRAT.
free dixie,sw