Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Dilemma in 2008
http://mostlydeadarmadillos.blogspot.com/ ^ | Sunday November 28, 2004 | Stephen Johnson

Posted on 11/28/2004 7:09:39 AM PST by CHAROM

Now that I have added a few inches to my waistline thanks to turkey and homemade cheesecake, I have had some time to ponder 2008. I have blogged about it before, because I think the election will pose a serious challenge for Republicans.

I believe the only way a Democrat can win the Presidency in 2008 or beyond is if the Republicans do something really foolish or arrogant in the next 4 years, or if they choose to run a candidate with a sordid past or some other blemish that can be exploited. With Ken Mehlman at RNC, the chances of that scenario playing out are minimized. So far, the people mentioned as possible candidates are Bill Frist, George Allen, John McCain, Rudy Guiliani, Jeb Bush, George Pataki, Mitt Romney, and Bill Owens. Of this entire list, only Jeb Bush and Bill Owens are capable of earning my support. Pro-abortion moderates can't win the nomination, regardless how much they are loved and adored by the liberal national press. And why the Republicans would consider running anyone from the US Senate is beyond me. The last sitting Senator to win the Presidency was John Kennedy. Senators make horrible candidates, just ask John Kerry and Bob Dole. No, the candidate HAS to be a Governor from a RED state. Its that simple. The voters like and prefer people with executive branch leadership experience to be President.

This is what the Democrats always fail to remember, and will forget it again in 2008. I will make a prediction now. Hillary Clinton WILL be the Democratic nominee in 2008. She already has the organization, the fundraising, and has begun campaigning. And if Harold Ickes becomes the chair at the DNC, the deal will be sealed. I am hoping and praying for this to happen. She will be an awful candidate and will be defeated easily.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: CaliRepublican97
Regardless of how you choose to define the word "liberal" or "conservative," if you let a single issue control that definition, then you defeat the purpose of the word. I know Senator McCain to be a lot more conservative by most everyones standards and definitions, than many classified as pro life in congress.

American Conservative union gives him a life time rating of 84%. I do not suggest that their ratings should be considered definitive. But I would hardly call him a "liberal."

At any rate, I'm quite glad to see that their is a conservative opposition to him. I do not wish to vote democrat in the future.

21 posted on 11/28/2004 3:01:51 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X

Toad


22 posted on 11/28/2004 3:26:50 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jdm
We'll this young conservative is concerned about Government waste and will proudly make his voice be heard in the first election in which he is eligable to vote on November 4, 2008.
23 posted on 11/28/2004 5:49:56 PM PST by AVNevis (Be Thankful for President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Sen. George Allen, as former governor of VA, has executive experience. Gov. Mitt Romney, as a Mormon, is almost certain to be pro-life. I'd pay to see Sec. Condoleezza Rice take on Sen. Hillary Clinton. Rice would crush the World's Smartest Woman with half her brain tied behind her back.


24 posted on 11/29/2004 1:07:51 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Patriotism is patriotic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Why is it that cowville, VA (a/k/a Harrisoncow, etc.) and its locals (a/k/a hillbillies) choose to vote Republican? I would think they and their 1200 toothless children would need to suck the government boobie.


25 posted on 12/06/2004 3:41:41 PM PST by Little Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Bush

Because Hillary's dental plan is of no use to them.


26 posted on 12/07/2004 6:17:08 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson