[SONbrad]

Why yes, Skeeter, I did. And did you notice that as long as Tom continues to finish 3rd he will hand the governorship to that very same Democrat. Just like Perot and all other spoliers who stay in the race for their "principles" and hand the election to the opposition.

That is really good thinking, huh?

If I can't win then you can't either! WAAAAA!

[skeeter]

If I can't win then you can't either! WAAAAA!

Please, your embarrassing us both.

I'll ask again - why doesn't Arnold try to get those conservative votes the old fashioned way - earn them?

[Theodore R.]

The difference between McClintock and Perot is that the latter had no consistent principles. He was guided by a personal hatred for GHWB. McClintock stands consistently for his conservative principles. Perot was (presumably still is) not a conservative.

[BearArms]

As we've seen here on this very thread, much of the support for McClintock is messianic in flavor. Many conservatives seem to see him as a Jesus-like figure who's standing for the truth against all odds. To abandon him and vote for Arnold or anyone else who is less than "pure" would be like abandoning Jesus, so it's not going to happen.

Now, since this is simply a gubernatorial election, not a messiah election, one can question whether this level of fervor and loyalty is merited or appropriate. But whatever the case, trying to convince certain folks that McClintock can't win so they should vote for Arnold is a losing proposition if there ever was one. My advice to Californians would be to get used to Democrats ruling over you.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

...RossSELFISH =

...20th Century President CLINTON

...McSELFISH =

...21st Century President CLINTON

[Dan from Michigan]

Just like Perot and all other spoliers who stay in the race for their "principles" and hand the election to the opposition.

Perot didn't spoil anything. GHWB didn't EARN those votes because of his tax raise and gun grab.