That's interesting, considering that you agreed to sign the agreement at least two different times prior to the 'troll' amendment being added.
Why were you OK with the agreement before that was added or discussed, but now you say you would have been disappointed or dropped out if it passed without that.
Maybe that is where the confusion for some people starts.
If I recall correctly, at each stage of the agreement I was pleased with the progress we were making. The "troll calling" provision was a late addition, and when it began to be discussed, it became something I wanted, because I thought it was important. Before it became an issue, it didn't enter into my thinking.