Replies

You will please desist from criticising a signatory for violoating said agreement since you are under no such constraints

False on all counts. First of all ALS signed on to the agreement, the only part he withheld from accepting and being bound by was the 'troll' section. Second of all, the agreement protects all, not just the signers. Thirdly, as to section 6A both jennyp and Patrick Henry have gotten involved in that discussion which has been going on for a long time. So if you wish to invoke that section you have to invoke it against all that have been involved in that part of the discussion, not just against ALS. In addition, it seems a bit late to invoke it. The appropriate time would have been when it had just started.

I engaged when I had sure footing and advice from others, I engaged when it was appropriate.

He is NOT a signatory to the agreement, he backed out of it.

Therefore, anything he has to say or critique is not worth the keyboard it's typed on.

He is NOT complying with said agreement and has stated that he won't, and seeing his behavior on this thread, it is obvious that he will not.

Therefore, EVERYTHING that I have stated is true, I have complied with said agreement, as witnessed to by everyone here.

THe moderator of the agreement even stated that I was in compliance.

It is time for me to go to bed, have a wonderful evening.

False on all counts. First of all ALS signed on to the agreement, the only part he withheld from accepting and being bound by was the 'troll' section.

Agreement of the Willing - Free Republic Science Threads ^
			Posted by ALS to general_re On News/Activism ^ 08/08/2003 9:02 PM CDT #332 of 579 ^ why that's funny. so why are you trying to convince andrewc to? no sorry, the agreement I signed on to "did not pass" and I clearly stated I would not support an agreement that sanctioned name calling, as everyone knows. Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 331 \| View Replies

Agreement of the Willing - Free Republic Science Threads ^
			Posted by ALS to general_re On News/Activism ^ 08/08/2003 9:09 PM CDT #334 of 579 ^ It was "my baby", but what it turned into wasn't, as you previously made clear: "LOL - disappointed that your baby got pulled out from under you, eh?" I did not sign the agreement that won. Which means, an agreement I couldn't get you guys to sign on to, you happily signed on to, and all it took was a bit of child psychology, and walla! tick tock :) see ya at midnight! Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 333 \| View Replies

Pheobe Debates The Theory of Evolution ^
			Posted by ALS to jennyp On The Smokey Backroom ^ 08/10/2003 1:34 AM CDT #2,214 of 2,275 ^ I'm not a signator to the name calling agreement, dummy. Now that leaves you in the unenviable position of realizing you are in violation of your own agreement. Please take a moment to read through it, and getta clue. Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 2,212 \| View Replies