To: Aurelius
I've considered the War in this way. An abused wife, who is no angel herself, chooses to leave her abusive husband. The abusive husband, being stronger than the wife, and after inflicting grievious injury, forces her to return home to continued abuse.
29 posted on
06/12/2003 7:47:35 AM PDT by
D1X1E
(Liberal...someone so open-minded that their brains have fallen out.)
To: D1X1E
"I've considered the War in this way. An abused wife, who is no angel herself, chooses to leave her abusive husband. The abusive husband, being stronger than the wife, and after inflicting grievious injury, forces her to return home to continued abuse."
Many Northerners would add the caveat that the husband forces the wife to stay in the house so he can keep her from abusing the kids, which she had been doing contunuously. Buying and selling them, even... ;)
To: D1X1E
Cute. Stupid and beside the point but cute.
114 posted on
06/12/2003 12:32:23 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: D1X1E
I've considered the War in this way. An abused wife, who is no angel herself, chooses to leave her abusive husband. The abusive husband, being stronger than the wife, and after inflicting grievious injury, forces her to return home to continued abuse. The source of the abuse being, of course, that the wife differed with her husband about whether she could sell her children.
To: D1X1E
I've considered the War in this way. An abused wife, who is no angel herself, chooses to leave her abusive husband. The abusive husband, being stronger than the wife, and after inflicting grievious injury, forces her to return home to continued abuse.
Good point, let's do it again.
1,361 posted on
07/08/2003 7:40:00 PM PDT by
Ethyl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson