REVISIONISTS of the leftist/statist/fascist sort don't even agree WHAT happened, much less why. what they do is LIE about uncomfortable facts.
once again, (SIGH!) all traditional historians were either neutral or PRO-dixie, untilm the rise of the FALLACY of revisionist historiography.
free dixie,sw
I suppose we can agree Davis, Stephens, and Grant were not "traditional historians." Since I don't care much for the Ivy league types anyway, I can probably agree with you about them. But who are the "traditional" historians that you refer to?