To: WhiskeyPapa; rustbucket; GOPcapitalist
"I think we have to assume that the Supreme Court was cognizant of the 9th and 10th amendments when they ruled --unanimously-- that the president was authorized --under the Militia Act -- to put down the rebellion."
Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them, so their decision is null and void.
1,232 posted on
07/03/2003 11:48:31 AM PDT by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Grand Old Partisan
Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them, so their decision is null and void.Now if we could just get Mrs. rustbucket to agree with my decisions...
To: Grand Old Partisan; WhiskeyPapa
Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them To bad. Sandra Day O'Connor could learn a lot about freedom if she would pull her head out of her backside and apply logical reasoning, rather than emotional bullsh*t artistry, as her guide for interpreting the Constitution.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson