Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa; rustbucket; GOPcapitalist
"I think we have to assume that the Supreme Court was cognizant of the 9th and 10th amendments when they ruled --unanimously-- that the president was authorized --under the Militia Act -- to put down the rebellion."

Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them, so their decision is null and void.


1,232 posted on 07/03/2003 11:48:31 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies ]


To: Grand Old Partisan
Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them, so their decision is null and void.

Now if we could just get Mrs. rustbucket to agree with my decisions...

1,233 posted on 07/03/2003 11:58:57 AM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1232 | View Replies ]

To: Grand Old Partisan; WhiskeyPapa
Yes, but the Supreme Court did not have Rustbucket and GOPcapitalist to explain the Constitution to them

To bad. Sandra Day O'Connor could learn a lot about freedom if she would pull her head out of her backside and apply logical reasoning, rather than emotional bullsh*t artistry, as her guide for interpreting the Constitution.

1,235 posted on 07/03/2003 12:38:51 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson