Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine; sauropod
I think the underlying question is: What defines a "substantial arbitrary imposition" or "purposeless restraint"?
379 posted on 04/08/2003 11:41:37 AM PDT by SgtofMarines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]


To: SgtofMarines
I think the underlying question is: What defines a "substantial arbitrary imposition" or "purposeless restraint"?
-sgt-

Common sense.
Infringments on our liberties as outlined in our constitution are fairly obvious to most of us.

Those who quibble on technicalities, have other, - imo usually anticonstitutional, -- political agendas.
388 posted on 04/08/2003 11:54:17 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

To: SgtofMarines
well, there IS the crux.
acc. to my brother - a (former) lawyer - the law IN PRACTISE means what the judge says it means.
392 posted on 04/08/2003 11:59:32 AM PDT by demosthenes the elder (The Jesuits TRAINED me - they didn't TAME me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson