To: tpaine; sauropod
I think the underlying question is: What defines a "substantial arbitrary imposition" or "purposeless restraint"?
To: SgtofMarines
I think the underlying question is: What defines a "substantial arbitrary imposition" or "purposeless restraint"?
-sgt-
Common sense.
Infringments on our liberties as outlined in our constitution are fairly obvious to most of us.
Those who quibble on technicalities, have other, - imo usually anticonstitutional, -- political agendas.
388 posted on
04/08/2003 11:54:17 AM PDT by
tpaine
To: SgtofMarines
well, there IS the crux.
acc. to my brother - a (former) lawyer - the law IN PRACTISE means what the judge says it means.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson