To: Alamo-Girl
This is true, and I respect physicists opinion GREATLY.
But, the fact of the matter is that evolution is based on reliable facts and evidence that are easily seen.
Physicist works in a more interesting science, it is going to be a while before we are technologically ABLE to say that the particles and graviton waves etc, actually exist, as fact. It sure makes sense, but there is yet to be any physical evidence, but, it is INDEED science, and I love it when physicist tosses his studies into these discussions, they are WAY over my head of course, but they are VERY fascinating.
909 posted on
01/21/2003 9:32:15 PM PST by
Aric2000
(Evolution is science, ID/Creationism are religious, any questions?)
To: Aric2000
Thank you for your post! Indeed, Physicist is a treasure to Free Republic! I brought his previous post to your attention in the event you would want to qualify your previous statement in some way. In my view, scientific theories have to survive a highly critical peer review process before they are taken seriously - and they should always include a means of falsification. Once taken seriously, two mindsets get to work - one to substantiate, one to debunk.
913 posted on
01/21/2003 9:41:07 PM PST by
Alamo-Girl
(Magnus frater spectat te...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson