Replies

"Are you by chance a member of the Flat Earth Society?"

No. Are you by chance trying to say evolution "science" was responsible for proving the earth to be a slightly malformed sphere? What's your point? What shall we all believe from the Fictitious Evolution Society? What do you really know for sure with all that static between your antennae?

You You should know better than to devote so much time to so many bags of atoms that are happy to exchange six millennia of widespread common sense for a century and half of "new science."

Me Are you by chance a member of the Flat Earth Society?

You No. Are you by chance trying to say evolution "science" was responsible for proving the earth to be a slightly malformed sphere? What's your point? What shall we all believe from the Fictitious Evolution Society? What do you really know for sure with all that static between your antennae?

Nope. I was attempting to point out how absurd you first statement was. Just because something has been "common" knowledge for centuries does not mean that it is correct.

Heck, if a better theory replaces evolution because of newly discovered data, I am all for it. However, evolution is the best model we have to date to fit the current data set.

BTW, I do not "believe" in evolution. I accept the data that has been uncovered to date.