I'll grant you some of the creationists are at least trying to find evidence to fit their predetermined conclusions. This is a step above complete denial of science. I'll also grant that the evidence is sparse enough to admit a number of theories. That no one on this thread has presented evidence consistent with evolutionary theories is not correct. Certainly nothing has yet been presented to demonstrate the impossibility of any evolutionary theories. That being the case, you're not going to stop people from attempting to explain development of life on earth in terms consistent with our other observations in nature--along a continuum.
There have been insults. In thoughtful debate they have no place. In the rude refusal of the give-and-take of dialogue, the thoughtless theft of sincere debate for a crude sounding board, it is open season on the perpetrator.
Clearly you have not been reading the thread, or wish to ignore the facts. I certainly have shown that mammalian live bearing could not have descended from reptilian egg-laying so evolution has to be false since this shows it to be impossible.
This is a step above complete denial of science.
It is not religious people who are denying science. Science has flourished under Christianity (and not under any other form of belief). It is the atheist/materialist/evolutionists which deny science by claiming that matter organizes itself by random means. All the scientific laws disprove this, without specific cause and effect there is no science and evolutionists deny this.
There have been insults.
There sure have been, lots of them from your fellow evolutionist Dan Day whose every other sentence is an insult. You should be addressing this to him.