Why should deliberately careless distortions of observations and theories to conform to a predetermined belief, and vilifying close-minded defenses of ignorance and absurdity drive people away? You speak as though people are turned off by attacks on human thought.
519 posted on 01/19/2003 7:13 AM PST by beavus
fC...
You're on a conservative site promoting the liberal religion // creed . . . no problem // conflict for you ! ! !
"close-minded defenses of ignorance and absurdity"
Your words . . .
.. .. .. what would that be - - - "ignorance and absurdity" ? ? ?
Please explain!
I'm going out on a limb trying to interpret your post, but here goes...
defenses of ignorance and absurdity
ig·no·rance n. The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed.
E.g., post 14: "In physics, the Second Law of Thermodynamics...it is scientifically impossible for a less complex system, organic or inorganic, to move from the less to the more complex."
ab·surd`i·ty n. That which is absurd; an absurd action; a logical contradiction.
E.g., a contradictory non sequitur from the article--"First, there should be a lot more [transitional fossils] if Darwin's theory is correct. Second, 99 percent of the biology of an organism is in its soft anatomy, which you cannot access in a fossil..."