[Dakmar]

I suppose we could debate the what the meaning of 'is' is, but that's been done to death. My point is that I refuse to let would-be tyrants like LibertyLoather re-define the terms of the debate by re-defining the essential meaning of the English language with legalistic parlour tricks.

[Libloather]

...re-define the terms of the debate...

Can you name one law, besides whatever is in the UCMJ, that would place an individual behind bars for the crime of smoking pot?

(Is this REALLY that hard to understand?)

[scholar]

Don't know about anyone else here but I have to work for a living and can't follow this thread blow-by-blow. For someone who can only check pings occasionally, the discussion has become so bizarre it is impossible to follow.

BTW, I don't want anymore pings for this thread either.