[tortoise]

There are but a small number of mathematicians who are really competent enough in the field of Information Theory to assert with any confidence as to how it works -- it is an unintuitive field of mathematics. Unfortunately, there are legions of people who think they understand something about information theory but invariably do not. No mathematician competent in the field of Information Theory would make the mistakes that these "evolution debunkers" have been making, and the kinds of mistakes they are making demonstrate conclusively that they do not have sufficient expertise in the field to use the mathematical theorems of that field in practice.

[Paul Ross]

Walter James Remine does. Read his book.

[gore3000]

No mathematician competent in the field of Information Theory would make the mistakes that these "evolution debunkers" have been making, and the kinds of mistakes they are making demonstrate conclusively that they do not have sufficient expertise in the field to use the mathematical theorems of that field in practice.

Are you one of the 'small number of mathematicians" who can judge the veracity of ID? Care to tell us exactly what the mistakes are in ID? Or are you just speaking nonsense and trying to baffle us with bs?