[dubyagee]

But evolution, by contrast, does have testable consequences, and it passes those tests brilliantly on two fronts: genetics and paleontology.

Couldn't those genetics consequences also be said to 'back' creation, in that the codes are written to support life. Wouldn't they need to be 'written' by an Intelligence? How is that more difficult to believe than 'accidental' order?

[f.Christian]

In the little picture--pieces(cartoons/ideologies/religion)...

everybody thinks(knows) they are right and anyone else/thing(different) is wrong---

then comes the big/final picture!

Truth/science/CREATION/GOD is LAWS/DESIGN---IMMUTABLE!

[Physicist]

Couldn't those genetics consequences also be said to 'back' creation, in that the codes are written to support life. Wouldn't they need to be 'written' by an Intelligence? How is that more difficult to believe than 'accidental' order?

Evolution--at least as regards the higher organisms--requires the tree structure exhibited by genetic cladograms. Had it been otherwise, evolution would have been falsified. Any old structure would have been compatible with special creation, so no particular structure can be said to lend support to the idea.