[pinz-n-needlez]

I don't know what my opinion about that case has to do with this case.

We don't know how Danielle got dead, or when she got dead. Yet a man is possibly facing his own death becaused she got dead.

If there were more solid information about how she got dead, it would be possible to come to a firmer, more rational conclusion about whether DW was likely to have killed her.

Having child porn on one's computer is not punishable by death under US or CA law.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I just wanted to mention how thankful I am that there is another place to discuss this trial besides this thread.

I tuned out everything Westerfield over the three-day weekend and dared to glance here this morning.

Wouldn't you know it.......it was like opening the door and finding a snake. When I see 4 or 5 posts in a row by the resident pain, I know this is not the place to start the week.

Just had to say that and I know you get my drift.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Having the victim's blood on your clothes gets you convicted.

But then again, I guess you also defended OJ.

[Ditter]

>>how she got dead>>>>

Thats a strange way to put it. She didn't die of disease or old age she wasn't killed by wild animals. DW was convicted because her blood was on his jacket & in his MH. The prints in the NH helped, as did the hair in his drain. The child porn was just the icing on the cake. Maybe someday he will tell us about it. Will you believe it then?