I don't know why the foot was gone. Was it gnawed off, were there teeth marks? Was it sliced cleanly off? Ripped off? You know, that was the same question that came to me. When the ME's stated her vaginal area was missing, and her foot, my question was did they find evidence of KNIFE CUT or animal teeth marks, or tearing? To my knowledge the ME never stated how the foot, organs were removed. That to me, was puzzling. If they disclosed the foot was "CUTOFF", then it would throw the wrong slant on this case, and they couldn't have that.
The problem with that idea though, is why didn't Feldman ask the ME about this. I don't know the answer. Everyone was so willing to ASSUME things in this case.
Like Dusek... SHE IS DEAD - therefore you may assume he killed her.
BUT, you didn't answer my question. in those dead cows, did you ever find that animals ate the foot?
I don't remember a missing foot on a cow. Coyotes fight over dead things. Remember we are talking about small (I am not familiar with the wildlife there) predators wanting the tender parts first (entrails). On a cow or horse there is a hoof. Hooves & deer horns get gnawed up by rats. Birds will peck out the eyes. I guess you would have to see the forensic reports to get the details.
Yes, more unanswered questions. What kind of murder trial is this when the ME doesn't go into details like that? Folks here have pointed out that removing the left foot and the entrails connotes Satanic practices. Well that I don't know, but why isn't anyone coming out and saying whether it was animals or human interference??
Glad you're here to keep this thread on track, UCANSEE2