It’s not worth the time and effort, that image in the crowd from a video is a boy, and that’s the end of it. Funny thing is, there is a woman sitting amongst the people at the funeral, she’s wearing dark glasses - but no one noticed her. Trowbridge has found one face in the crowd OF A YOUNG BOY and has no idea who that might have been.
And from this, we get a theory that ALL of SAD’S images, AND THAT MEANS HUNDREDS have all been tampered with.
It’s too ridiculous to spend any more time on imo. Those who want to believe that’s someone named Jo Ann Newman with zero by the river, will believe it no matter what you try to show them.
And notice, it’s not as if the image used in that article was IDENTIFIED - it was just AN ILLUSTRATION.
But that didn’t stop people sending it to me to show me they had found Jo Ann Newman.
“Trowbridge has found one face in the crowd OF A YOUNG BOY..”
Surely that is a matter of opinion. I think “Stanley Ann” looks like a boy, Martha thinks she can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. I think Martha has it.
I only discussed the photoshopping actually to be fair and even handed!
I think it’s clear that the Trowbridge “SAD’s photos are all totally shopped and she’s actually Jo Ann Newmann” to be horse feathers.
“...we get a theory that ALL of SAD’S images, AND THAT MEANS HUNDREDS have all been tampered with”
Not ALL but MANY especially when “she” was a young STANLEY named after a man Madeleine wasn’t even married to. Ha Ha.