Let me see if I got it.
" One day, after ‘Barry’ was born,(IF YOU BELIEVE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT WOULD BE AUG 5TH 1961) she came for an afternoon, (on her way from Hawaii to join her husband at Harvard.)” Blake remembers “the infant. He was sweet and pink and very new.” The two talked and cuddled the baby. “And I changed Barack Obama’s diapers.” http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2008/01/14/tidbits2.html
(The kenyan student left Hawaii on the 22nd of June 1962, met Hal Abercrombie and his wife at ‘The Blue Fox’ on the mainland, and did a bus trip to Cambridge in time to start Harvard in September.) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/22/AR2008082201679_5.html
How could Stanley Ann Dunham be going to meet Obama Sr at Harvard on August 5th 1961 1 day after Obama Jr. was born? (That is if you believe the birth certificate)when Obama Sr. didn't leave to go to Harvard until June 22nd 1962 and how could Abercrombie know Stanley and Obama SR well (like he said) when Blake says Obama Sr was already at Harvard and Stanley left Hawaii the day after Jr was born.
My head is spinning now, but did I get the point?
YOU GOT IT!
They toss so many droppings out there that absolutely nullify each other.
Um...”One day, after Barry was born,” (the way it was written) is not the same as “One day after Barry was born,” (the way you are interpreting it)! The placement of the comma makes the phrase mean “One day, a day sometime after Barry was born,..” She is qualifying the day that Stanley Ann came to visit and she is saying it was a day that was after Barry was born. IOW, the “day” in the phrase references the day of the visit by Stanley Ann and she notes it was after Barry was born.
Remember that Blake was about 66 years old trying to remember events 46 years earlier involving the ridiculously complex narrative of Stanley Ann’s romance in the one year since she graduated with her from Mercer HS.
At the time of this interview, the only narrative was Barry’s (and Ayers’) “Dreams” fantasy, the fantasy sold to the nation on which Barry was elected based on his 2004 speech at the convention. This narrative was a big lie because it hid her year at U of WA, but the Blake interview was before the lie was revealed. So the media conducting the interviews and perhaps even Blake herself were likely intentionally or unwittingly forcing her account of her meeting with Stanley Ann into the “Dreams” template...the only one out there at the time...with the little family in Hawaii for “two years” before BHO Sr. left for Harvard.
So to fit the “Dreams” narrative, the visit to Blake had to be framed by the media and by her (after someone likely had a talk with her) was that Stanley Ann and Barry were passing through...Oh yeah...it was to check out Harvard, that’s it!...Not the truth, which was Stanley Ann and Barry were in Seattle because she was enrolled at a university in Seattle, just as the FOIA INA docs anticipated.