to prove you wrong I have to search every post I have ever made to find when and where I have ever said anything that I claim to have said.....
Meanwhile you get to claim that I have lied in the interim.
it isn't up to me to prove you wrong it is up to you to prove I am lying that means you have to search through all of my posts until you find every post I have made on this subject and accurately post them here with the time and date when I made them including a link to the original thread, anything else by you is pure blather and bovine excrement. I don't have to prove me wrong you do.
Run in those troll circles...run round and round and round and round...It never stops. We have what we need and a court has to decide this issue based on the facts and documents. The trolls are only pretending to have an equal case by running a three ring circus of knots on these threads...
It reminds me of the great liberal minds who claimed BJ’s impeachment was “only about sex” when it was about sexual aggression/abuse of employees and perjury. No matter what the truth was, the liars’ circus kept goin’ round and round right up to and including “scottish law.”
You mean the phantom sources you can't find and won't share?
to prove you wrong I have to search every post I have ever made to find when and where I have ever said anything that I claim to have said
Um...no. No, that's not right at all. You've claimed that people started talking about Obama's eligibility in January 2007. Maybe that includes you, maybe not. But to prove you didn't make that up, that in no way means you have to search every post you've ever made; that's silly.
No, it just means that you have to take whatever source you're thinking of from January 2007 (or even from anytime in 2007), and share it. If you're so certain that it was being discussed in January 2007, then surely you must remember where or who was doing the discussing.
The only reason such a feat would be difficult would be is if you're actually relying on nothing more than your own memory of things you read online 2+ years ago.
And to illustrate how faulty memory can sometimes be, I'll demonstrate: when I checked my notes, I realized that the FR thread I linked to yesterday was, in fact, the third eligibility thread at FR. Two others beat it by just a few hours. All three were directly or indirectly spawned by Jim Geraghty's NRO column of June 9.
it isn't up to me to prove you wrong it is up to you to prove I am lying that means you have to search through all of my posts until you find every post I have made on this subject and accurately post them here with the time and date when I made them including a link to the original thread, anything else by you is pure blather and bovine excrement.
Yeesh. Capital letters and punctuation exist for a reason, y'know.
In any case, here y'go:
usmcobra's first post in an eligibility thread - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2028597/posts?page=149#149 . It's from June 10, 2008.
It was the same time you were still spreading the bogus made-up rumor that Obama Sr. was 88% Arab.
And just for kicks, every FR post you made in January 2007: http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:usmcobra/index?more=45184585 . No talk of Obama at all.