I am not running Windows, so I am not running any Windows scanners and I am not personally seeing any local scanner warnings.
However, the Google message seems to me to be specific enough to warrant calling the Taitz site infected:
What happened when Google visited this site?Of the 12 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 4 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2009-08-01, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2009-08-01.Malicious software includes 5 scripting exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 2 new process(es) on the target machine.
Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including cybercrime-protection.cn/, security-alerts.cn/, mcafee-malware.com/.
1 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, including security-alerts.cn/.
This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS6245 (NETWORK).
Could Google be mistaken? Yes, they certainly could. But I think the odds are good enough that there is a problem that I don't hesitate to call it infected.
Orly said that Google is misidentifying her website as malicious and has threatened to add them to the racketeering lawsuit.
Thanks for the data. Just to be safe, I'm going to run Malwarebytes anti-malware program before I shut down.
Malicious software is hosted on 3 domain(s), including mcafee-malware.com ?
Google is reporting Mcafee scanning of the site.
Clams Mcafee has malware!!
Rotflmao
GOOGLE lies!
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/orlytaitzesq.com
Site itself may not be infected but just has some javascript or something like that, posted by some adversary, which just redirects browsers to one of those malware sites. What it really means is that she needs to maintain better control of what is being posted at her site. She should probably hire an expert for that, but it should not be complicated.