1. You seem to have a thing about the lights.
2. The ‘thing’ seems to be your ‘thing.’ THEY don’t seem to have a problem about the lights.
3. Sometimes they use lights very dramatically.
4. Sometimes they seem to use lights very aggressively.
5. Sometimes they seem to avoid all lights and become invisible.
6. Sometimes they seem to use lights either playfully or deceptively seeming to be playful.
7. You seem to persistently ASSUME—taking a rather omniscient stance—that YOU have considered 100% of ALL possibilities and concluded that the reported stuff about the lights is all horse biscuits.
8. I’m sure the “ET’s,” WHATEVER they are—are GREATLY IMPRESSED AND AWED by your psychological understanding of
A) THEIR psychology;
B) THEIR goals;
C) THEIR methods;
D) THEIR priorities;
E) THEIR technical aspects, factors;
F) THEIR tastes;
G) THEIR preferences for whatever reasons;
H) THEIR policies about lights in a myriad of DIFFERENT CONTEXTS on a MYRIAD of DIFFERENT TYPES of missions;
. . .
Perhaps they’ll nominate you for their equivalent of a Nobel Prize for guessing all their psychology and all the above so accurately to the nth degree.
On the other hand, with different fingers . . . you just MAY be so smugly full of yourself that you really haven’t a clue about any of the above but have enjoyed getting your exercise by jumping to the conclusion that you have it all figured out.
Personally, I find your seeming conclusions about their lights to be exceedingly myopic and silly.
I don’t believe flying objects with aviation lights on them are aliens. It just makes no logical sense that they wouldn’t have night vision or some equivalent. If they wanted to screw with us, they would fly up to some building during the daytime and let some sane person take a clear picture of their craft. Now that would be a good prank.