Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
I merely wish to point out that a federal judge has ruled that atheistic science is the only credible science.

The judge is merely pointing out the obvious that science cannot detect the supernatural, thus is "atheistic". By definition, science deals with the natural world, therefore anything it can detect and measure is a part of the natural world, I.E. "atheistic".

That situation could change when the first scientist detects, or describes a method to determine the nature of God. That scientist will become the most famous in history too, so don't tell me that all scientists are anti-God and wouldn't attempt such work.

964 posted on 12/20/2005 1:51:09 PM PST by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies ]


To: narby

You talk out of both sides of your mouth. First you say science is by nature atheistic, then you suggest a scenario at some point down the road when a scientist might detect, or describe a method to determine the nature of God.


975 posted on 12/20/2005 1:55:21 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson