[Diamond]

"First, defense expert Professor Fuller agreed that ID aspires to “change the ground rules” of science and lead defense expert Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science, which encompasses ID, would also embrace astrology. (28:26 (Fuller); 21:37-42 (Behe)).

This bald, out-of-context, distortion and misrepresentation of Behe's testimony is belied by the transcript of the proceedings. It reminds me of the way "60 Minutes" operates.

Cordially,

[ThinkPlease]

This bald, out-of-context, distortion and misrepresentation of Behe's testimony is belied by the transcript of the proceedings. It reminds me of the way "60 Minutes" operates.

Found the transcript here: http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/Day11PMSession.pdf

The relevant section starts on Page 34 and runs through Page 45 or so. However, there's nothing in Behe's statements here that contradict the Judge's decision. He DID say those things (TWICE!). He tries to weasel out of why it isn't a Theory NOW, but one wouldn't need to play games with semantics if he used the accepted definition of a theory instead of one that he wishes were actually the definition. There's the evidence, I'll let everyone decide their own opinion.